Harris v. Georgia Department of Corrections
In this federal class action, the ACLU is seeking an injunction directing the Georgia Department of Corrections to immediately provide qualified American Sign Language interpreters, auxiliary aids and services, and reasonable modifications to deaf and hard of hearing individuals in prison. This lawsuit highlights how prison, probation, and parole systems fail deaf prisoners – leading deaf people to go to prison more often, stay longer, and return more quickly.
On October 3, 2018, the ACLU and the ACLU of Georgia, together with National Association of the Deaf and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of deaf and hard of hearing people incarcerated in prisons supervised by the Georgia Department of Corrections (GDC). The complaint highlights GDC’s failure to provide incarcerated deaf and hard of hearing people with equally effective communication access to programs, services, and activities, including medical care, telecommuni-cations, and prison programs.
Further, due to lack of access to interpreters and other communication accommodations, deaf prisoners are also often unable to explain or defend themselves when GDC takes disciplinary action against them.
The complaint also details the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles’ failure to provide equally effective communication access to the parole and reentry system, meaning that deaf prisoners are unable to respond appropriately to documents; often do not understand their sentences, parole eligibility dates, or how to maximize their chances for parole; and do not recognize errors in their sentence computations.
As a result of these agencies’ failures, deaf and hard of hearing prisoners in GDC custody face threats to their physical and mental health, and may serve longer sentences. Without effective communication access, these individuals may be unable to communicate with GDC guards, medical staff, counselors, and friends and family members. They miss meals, medication, appointments, laundry, and work assignments. They may face punishment for failing to follow instructions that are only conveyed orally and are therefore inaccessible. They are unable to effectively engage in GDC programs that may help them to be released on parole, or to develop skills to prepare for release.
The complaint alleges that GDC, along with the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles, are violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the United States Constitution.
CASE DETAILS
Status
Set for trial January 2022
Date
October 3, 2018
Plaintiffs
Ricardo Harris
Brandon Cob
Tommy Green
Leroy Henderson
Tony Moore, Jr.,
Christopher Shields
Andrew Smith
Darrell Smith, Jr.
Jorae Smith
On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Counsel
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Georgia, Inc.
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Disability Rights Program
Weil, Gotschal & Manges LLP
National Association of the Deaf
LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Harris v GDOC Complaint
Harris v GDOC Answer to Complaint
Harris v GDOC Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
Harris v GDOC Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
Harris v GDOC Stipulation of Dismissal of Parties
Harris v GDOC Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Class Certification
Harris v GDOC Defendants’ First Amended Answer and Defenses